This article documents a routing issue where a misconfigured subnet mask on interface prevented outbound ICMP and BGP traffic. The issue was resolved by correcting the subnet mask from /3 to /30
/3
/30
ICMP and BGP sessions were not establishing.
PE router was receiving traffic from the customer but was not transmitting any traffic out.
Affected services due to lack of outbound routing.
A configuration error where the subnet mask was incorrectly set to /3 instead of the required /30, resulting in improper routing behavior and packet forwarding issues.
The subnet mask was corrected via a configuration change on the affected logical interface.
re1> configure private
{master}[edit]
# Deleted incorrect subnet mask
delete interfaces lt-1/2/0 unit 2341 family inet address 100.x.x.x/3
# Applied correct subnet mask
set interfaces lt-1/2/0 unit 2341 family inet address 100.x.x.x/30
# Verified change
show | compare
[edit interfaces lt-1/2/0 unit 2341 family inet]
+ address 100.x.x.21/30;
- address 100.x.x.21/3;
# Committed change with tracking comment
commit and-quit
Configuration was successfully committed on both routing engines.
Services were restored immediately after the change.
BGP sessions and ICMP traffic began flowing as expected.
When a subnet mask (CIDR value) is incorrectly configured—especially if it's overly broad (e.g., /3 instead of /30)—it causes the router to interpret the IP address as part of a vastly larger subnet. This can lead to several issues: