ISSUE :
Customers may experience unexpected firewall filter behavior when configuring loopback interfaces (lo0.0, lo0.220, etc.) with separate filters per VRF.
lo0.0
lo0.220
EXAMPLE SCENARIO:
IN_PROTECT_RE_v4
ON_PROTECT_RE_v4
Firewall filters on different loopback units affect all instances rather than being isolated per VRF.
EX4300 switches do not support per-VRF loopback filtering. Firewall filters applied to loopback interfaces are evaluated as a whole, rather than per individual VRF.
The computations have changed in PR1775558, https://prsearch.juniper.net/problemreport/PR1775558 to prioritize the loopback filter from the interface filters.
SOLUTION:
{master:1}[edit]
labroot@switch# commit check [edit groups LOOPBACK interfaces lo0 unit 220 family inet filter input]
'IN_PROTECT_RE_v4'Loopback filter does not support VRF/Multiple filters at Ingress.commit-check failedcommit-check failederror: configuration check-out failed
2025-03-06 : Article Created