Contrail service Instance have a route policy attached which is not blocking route leaking as expected and configured, like others

The route policy is applied to the right Interface with the following terms configured

from prefix [x.x.x.x/32 exact] then action accept

from prefix [X:X:X:X:/56 exact] then action accept

from any then action reject

The above has a typo in the ipV6 prefix. Once fixes the route policy started working. Refer below for corrected policy

from prefix [x.x.x.x/32 exact] then action accept

from prefix [X:X:X:X:00::/56 exact] then action accept

from any then action reject