Description

Configuration queries on BGP

Symptoms

+Is it possible to configure 2 different AS in gobal routing table?

 

+When 2 static routes have same next-hop, which exit interface would be preferred?

Solution

-->Is it possible to configure 2 different AS in global routing table?

 

Solution:


Can configure multiple routing instances (VRFs) on the Juniper MX router, each with a different AS number.

 

EXAMPLE:

 

routing-instances {

   AS500 {

       instance-type vrf;

       route-distinguisher 500:1;

       vrf-target target:500:500;

       protocols {

           bgp {

               local-as 500;

           }

       }

   }

   AS234 {

       instance-type vrf;

       route-distinguisher 234:6;

       vrf-target target:234:234;

       protocols {

           bgp {

               local-as 234;

           }

       }

   }

}

 

+Other way is to use Logical-systems to use different AS as below example:

 

logical-systems {

   LS1 {

       autonomous-system 123;

       protocols {

           bgp {

               group peer1 {

                   type external;

                   peer-as 234;

                   neighbor 192.168.1.2;

               }

           }

       }

   }

   LS2 {

       autonomous-system 900;

       protocols {

           bgp {

               group peer2 {

                   type external;

                   peer-as 100;

                   neighbor 192.168.2.2;

               }

           }

       }

   }

}

 

-->When 2 static routes have same next-hop, which exit interface would be preferred?

 

 

Solution:


Qualified-next-hop is used in this scenario.

 

Please refer the below document for more information:

 

https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/static-routing/topics/topic-map/static-route-prefer-qualified-next-hop.html

 

If Qualified-next-hop is not preferred, lower AD value is considered which is not encouraged behaviour.

Modification History

2025-02-07 : Article Created