This article provides information about the MS-DPC syslog messages.
When a customer installs a MS-DPC card in one of the slots, they might see the following error messages in syslog:
May 31 07:02:40 SGCR01-re0 (FPC Slot 4, PIC Slot 0) SERVICES_UI: %PFE-3: Failed to write reply May 31 07:02:40 SGCR01-re0 (FPC Slot 4, PIC Slot 0) SERVICES_UI: %PFE-3: Failed while processing message type 23 subtype 18 [success]
{MASTER} lab@mx480-1-re1> show services stateful-firewall flows Interface: sp-2/0/0, Service set: service-snat Flow State Dir Frm count TCP 212.65.154.50:21 -> 139.7.35.40:40883 Forward O 12 TCP 139.7.35.33:40701 -> 212.65.154.34:80 Forward I 84 TCP 212.65.154.32:20 -> 139.7.35.25:41039 Forward O 6 TCP 212.65.154.35:21 -> 139.7.35.38:41653 Forward O 12 TCP 212.65.154.34:80 -> 139.7.35.27:41808 Forward O 75 TCP 212.65.154.32:80 -> 139.7.35.30:42290 Forward O 27 TCP 212.65.154.31:21 -> 139.7.35.27:41706 Forward O 12 TCP 212.65.154.31:20 -> 139.7.35.39:41099 Forward O 6 TCP 139.7.35.31:40204 -> 212.65.154.38:80 Forward I 84 TCP 139.7.35.31:41603 -> 212.65.154.45:20 Forward I 5 TCP 139.7.35.25:42029 -> 212.65.154.36:21 Forward I 16 TCP 139.7.35.23:41943 -> 212.65.154.42:80 Forward I 48 TCP 139.7.35.26:42473 -> 212.65.154.44:20 Forward I 5 TCP 139.7.35.36:41119 -> 212.65.154.48:80 Forward I 83 TCP 139.7.35.33:41123 -> 212.65.154.35:21 Forward I 16 TCP 139.7.35.29:41861 -> 212.65.154.39:21 Forward I 17 TCP 139.7.35.29:41311 -> 212.65.154.47:20 Forward I 5 TCP 139.7.35.35:42064 -> 212.65.154.49:80 Forward I 39 TCP 139.7.35.23:42205 -> 212.65.154.36:80 Forward I 28 TCP 212.65.154.49:21 -> 139.7.35.38:41774 Forward O 12 TCP 139.7.35.34:42261 -> 212.65.154.43:21 Forward I 16 TCP 212.65.154.39:21 -> 139.7.35.30:41732 Forward O 12 TCP 212.65.154.47:20 -> 139.7.35.26:41851 Forward O 6 TCP 212.65.154.38:80 -> 139.7.35.24:41637 Forward O 91 TCP 139.7.35.37:41158 -> 212.65.154.33:21 Forward I 17 TCP 139.7.35.29:41040 -> 212.65.154.46:20 Forward I 5 TCP 139.7.35.28:40823 -> 212.65.154.47:80 Forward I 83 TCP 212.65.154.40:80 -> 139.7.35.29:40716 Forward O 93 TCP 212.65.154.45:21 -> 139.7.35.30:41172 Forward O 12 TCP 139.7.35.37:41857 -> 212.65.154.42:21 Forward I 17 TCP 139.7.35.33:40878 -> 212.65.154.43:21 Forward I 16 TCP 139.7.35.36:41293 -> 212.65.154.36:20 Forward I 6 TCP 139.7.35.24:41286 -> 212.65.154.35:20 Forward I 5 TCP 212.65.154.45:21 -> 139.7.35.33:41719 Forward O 12 TCP 139.7.35.30:41641 -> 212.65.154.46:80 Forward I 80 TCP 212.65.154.50:80 -> 139.7.35.29:41271 Forward O 93 TCP 139.7.35.27:41387 -> 212.65.154.43:21 Forward I 16 TCP 212.65.154.40:80 -> 139.7.35.32:41994 Forward O 57 ---(more)--- < more pages are yet to be displayed Now if you press 'q' then check the syslog messages, you will see the 'Failed' messages
{MASTER} lab@mx480-1-re1> show log messages | match services | last 10 Jun 1 12:29:30 mx480-1-re1 init: periodic-packet-services (PID 1417) sending signal hup: due to "proto-mastership": 0x1 Jun 1 12:29:30 mx480-1-re1 init: pic-services-logging (PID 5163) started Jun 1 12:29:30 mx480-1-re1 init: adaptive-services (PID 5165) started Jun 1 12:51:21 mx480-1-re1 (FPC Slot 2, PIC Slot 0) SERVICES_UI: Failed to write reply Jun 1 12:51:21 mx480-1-re1 (FPC Slot 2, PIC Slot 0) SERVICES_UI: Failed while processing message type 23 subtype 18 [success] Jun 1 12:54:47 mx480-1-re1 (FPC Slot 2, PIC Slot 0) SERVICES_UI: Failed to write reply Jun 1 12:54:47 mx480-1-re1 (FPC Slot 2, PIC Slot 0) SERVICES_UI: Failed while processing message type 23 subtype 18 [success] Jun 1 12:56:44 mx480-1-re1 (FPC Slot 2, PIC Slot 0) SERVICES_UI: Failed to write reply Jun 1 12:56:44 mx480-1-re1 (FPC Slot 2, PIC Slot 0) SERVICES_UI: Failed while processing message type 23 subtype 18 [success] {MASTER} lab@mx480-1-re1>
This is expected and not a bug
This error message is expected, when a show command is killed on the RE. For example, if the show services stateful-firewall flows command is executed and you press quit after a few pages, this error message will be generated on the console. This is expected and not a bug. In other words, this error message has nothing to do with ALGs.